CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+19832%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro NVS 320M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
20W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy