Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +19832%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
20W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy