CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+3092%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 3800
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
108W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
Related News
1
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
2
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
3
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
4
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
5
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
6
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
7
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
8
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
9
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
10
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy