CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
8184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+77531%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro NVS 450
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
8192
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.920 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.920 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.20 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA A10G
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy