Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
8184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +77531%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
8192
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.920 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.920 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.20 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy