CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro P600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+1133%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro P600
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K500
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Related News
1
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
2
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
3
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
4
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
5
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
6
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
7
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
8
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
9
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
10
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy