CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro P620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+964%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro P620
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
5
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K340
7
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
Related News
1
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
2
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
3
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
4
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
5
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
6
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
7
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
8
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
9
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
10
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy