CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1335MHz
Lower TDP (20W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+169%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
RTX A500 Embedded
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
20W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
4
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
6
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
7
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy