Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1215MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
3.11 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +374%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
8192
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy