Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
Lower TDP (110W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +84%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
8192
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
160
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
110W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy