Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M60

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M60

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 8GB VRAM Tesla M60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M60 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +205%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla M60
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy