CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Tesla X2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+1007%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Tesla X2090
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Arctic Sound M
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Related News
1
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
2
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
3
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
4
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
5
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
6
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
7
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
8
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
9
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
10
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy