CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Tesla X2070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla X2070 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+1165%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla X2070
1.166 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Tesla X2070
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.46 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1166 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
582.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-876-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Related News
1
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
2
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
3
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
4
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
5
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
6
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
7
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
8
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
9
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
10
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy