Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla X2070 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +1165%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla X2070
1.166 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.46 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1166 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
582.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-876-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy