Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 290

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +11445%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy