Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 320GB)
Lower TDP (20W vs 143W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.36GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 +442%
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
320MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
96
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
20
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
G80
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
143W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy