Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon R7 265

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +4409%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy