Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +1850%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
6
40
Shading Units
480
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy