Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 +2006%
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy