Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5950 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI Radeon HD 5950 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 5950 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 5950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (302W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 5950
2.088 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +63%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2012
Evergreen
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
1792
72
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
52.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.088 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

302W
TDP
375W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hemlock
GPU Name
Tahiti
Hemlock PRO
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy