Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5950 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

ATI Radeon HD 5950 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 5950 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 5950 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 302W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Evergreen
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
52.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
2.088 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

302W
TDP
15W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hemlock
GPU Name
VSA-101
Hemlock PRO
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
180 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.4
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy