Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16856 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +147709%
62.08 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
40
528
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
20W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Blackwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy