Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1837MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +716%
62.08 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Feb 2021
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
36
16896
Shading Units
2304
528
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
64
528
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
185W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Blackwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
208 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy