Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +10010%
62.08 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
May 2011
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
512
528
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
32
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
75W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Blackwell
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
208 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
Unknown
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy