Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1837MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +2507%
62.08 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Nov 2020
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
768
528
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
24
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
300W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
Blackwell
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
208 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy