Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
16176 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (86W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +6058%
62.08 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6750
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2011
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
9
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
720
528
TMUs
36
24
ROPs
16
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
86W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
Juniper
-
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
Blackwell
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
208 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
Unknown
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy