Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +36618%
11.75 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
40
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Volta
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy