CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FirePro V7750
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI FirePro V7750
VS
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
ATI FirePro V7750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210
+2194%
11.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210
VS
FirePro V7750
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
5120
Shading Units
320
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
Volta
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
76W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
2
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
3
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
5
Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
6
AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
8
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI Radeon X1550
9
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
10
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs ATI Radeon HD 5470
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy