Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
5008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +3397%
11.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Feb 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
14
5120
Shading Units
112
320
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy