Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jul 2005
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
12
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
83W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Volta
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy