Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +11198%
11.75 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6350
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Feb 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
-
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
80
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Volta
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy