Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (2040MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +275%
11.75 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
810 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
32bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Volta
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy