Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1425MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 100HX 210 +974%
11.75 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
May 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

555 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1147 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
810 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
96 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

146.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
367.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
23.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
11.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
5.873 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy