Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1650MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (185W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +66%
12.63 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Feb 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
70
SM Count
36
4480
Shading Units
2304
280
TMUs
144
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
185W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
TU106
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy