Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1645MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +172%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1327 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
22
4480
Shading Units
1408
280
TMUs
88
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 14
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy