Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +283%
12.63 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Feb 2016
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1792
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
265W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Tonga
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy