Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro W7000

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +419%
12.63 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1280
280
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy