Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2006
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
-
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
NV43
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
110 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy