Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 483.8GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1500MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (230W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +17%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2017
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
852 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
56
4480
Shading Units
3584
280
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Vega 10
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy