Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1410MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +277%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
827 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1792
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Tahiti
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy