Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 409.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1546MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Vega 10
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy