Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +170%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
May 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1280
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Cayman
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy