Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1785MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +76%
5.027 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jul 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
14
1408
Shading Units
896
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
TU116
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy