Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (1785MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +165%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Feb 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1024
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy