NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1650MHz
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+40%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
445 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
