Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2040MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (32W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +142%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Navi 24
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy