NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2550MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+758%
65.28 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 40HX
1174
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+412%
6013
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
100
2304
Shading Units
12800
144
TMUs
400
64
ROPs
176
288
Tensor Cores
400
36
RT Cores
100
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
AD102
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
AD102
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
