Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +1493%
7.603 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT200
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy