Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +822%
11.07 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
5 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
RV770
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy