Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2130MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 70HX
10.71 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +12%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
608.3GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
22
3840
Shading Units
2816
120
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
120
Tensor Cores
88
30
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
167.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
10.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
10.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
167.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
AD107
GA104-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy