Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 90HX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 90HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
6184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 90HX +3983%
21.89 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
448bit
760.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
50
SM Count
27
6400
Shading Units
216
200
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
28
200
Tensor Cores
-
50
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

136.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
342.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
21.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
21.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
342.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

320W
TDP
171W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
GA102-100-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy