Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +824%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GF104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy