Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1950MHz vs 1545MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
+78%
7.119 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
8
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
